PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.66
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 31.34. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
5.07
Similar P/S to SEDG's 6.15. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
-11.09
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 2.88. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-27.57
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 42.32. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-87.95
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 34.60. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-11.09
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 2.88. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-6.83%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-3.63%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.