PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.48
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 23.66. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
6.67
Similar P/S to SEDG's 6.62. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
-8.11
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 2.87. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-12.69
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 39.26. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-15.60
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 31.88. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-8.11
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 2.87. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
-3.86%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-7.88%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.