PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.19
P/E less than half of SEDG's 68.82. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
11.45
P/S less than half of SEDG's 35.62. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
-305.46
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 11.67. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-64.48
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-72.04
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 424.46. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-305.46
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 11.67. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
3.48%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.36%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-1.55%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.