PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-14.51
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 123.59. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.16
P/S less than half of SEDG's 36.67. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
7.81
P/B 50-75% of SEDG's 13.52. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-65.32
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-69.53
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 617.38. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
7.81
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SEDG's 13.52. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.72%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.53%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.