PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-8.40
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 65.44. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
8.76
P/S less than half of SEDG's 26.38. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
7.74
P/B 50-75% of SEDG's 11.18. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-122.11
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 421.86. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-119.57
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 224.75. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
7.74
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SEDG's 11.18. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-2.98%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-0.82%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.