PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-37.11
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 137.02. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
11.81
P/S less than half of SEDG's 27.71. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
11.54
P/B 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 9.03. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
-34.79
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-38.04
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
11.54
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 9.03. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better prospects.
-0.67%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.87%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.