PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-10.68
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 251.61. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
6.46
P/S less than half of SEDG's 20.86. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
6.53
Similar P/B to SEDG's 7.49. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-38.54
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 528.20. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-48.32
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 196.10. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
6.53
Similar fair value ratio to SEDG's 7.49. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-2.34%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.59%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.