PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.35
P/E less than half of SEDG's 137.39. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
8.61
P/S 50-75% of SEDG's 16.25. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
7.35
P/B 1.1-1.25x SEDG's 6.63. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior asset utilization.
-184.89
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-774.79
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 2446.51. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
7.35
Fair value ratio 1.1-1.25x SEDG's 6.63. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior economics.
3.40%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x SEDG's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-0.54%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.