PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-13.88
Negative P/E while SEDG shows 31.75. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
3.74
P/S less than half of SEDG's 15.31. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
3.81
P/B 50-75% of SEDG's 6.02. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-49.60
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-90.39
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
3.81
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SEDG's 6.02. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.80%
Negative earnings while SEDG shows yield of 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.02%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.