PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.71
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check if industry conditions create special situations.
2.33
P/S less than half of SEDG's 10.12. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.37
Similar P/B to SEDG's 2.95. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
32.40
Positive FCF while SEDG shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
21.56
P/OCF less than half of SEDG's 180.84. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
2.37
Similar fair value ratio to SEDG's 2.95. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-3.73%
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
3.09%
Positive FCF while SEDG shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.