PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
0.70
Positive P/E while SEDG shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.48
P/S less than half of SEDG's 4.58. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
-1.34
Negative equity while SEDG shows P/B of 1.19. Joel Greenblatt would examine balance sheet repair potential.
-5.11
Negative FCF while SEDG shows P/FCF of 9896.63. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
-5.13
Negative operating cash flow while SEDG shows P/OCF of 63.37. Joel Greenblatt would examine operational improvement potential.
-1.34
Negative fair value while SEDG shows ratio of 1.19. Joel Greenblatt would examine valuation model differences.
35.84%
Positive earnings while SEDG shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-19.57%
Negative FCF while SEDG shows yield of 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.