PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-56.50
Negative P/E while Solar median is -4.78. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
4.91
P/S 50-90% of Solar median of 6.69. Mohnish Pabrai would investigate if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
1.45
P/B 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 1.20. John Neff would demand superior ROE to justify premium.
-13.76
Negative FCF while Solar median P/FCF is -12.62. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-19.09
Negative operating cash flow while Solar median P/OCF is -14.29. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
1.45
Fair value ratio 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 1.20. John Neff would demand superior metrics to justify premium.
-0.44%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is -1.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-7.27%
Negative FCF while Solar median yield is -2.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.