PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-9.93
Negative P/E while Solar median is 3.12. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
5.89
P/S 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 4.96. John Neff would demand superior growth or margins to justify premium.
1.46
P/B 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 1.21. John Neff would demand superior ROE to justify premium.
-11.77
Negative FCF while Solar median P/FCF is -1.43. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-21.54
Negative operating cash flow while Solar median P/OCF is 0.00. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
1.46
Fair value ratio 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 1.21. John Neff would demand superior metrics to justify premium.
-2.52%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is 0.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-8.49%
Negative FCF while Solar median yield is -0.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.