PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.00
Negative P/E while Solar median is 0.42. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
3.51
P/S near Solar median of 3.33. Charlie Munger would examine if similar pricing reflects similar economics.
3.89
P/B exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.97. Jim Chanos would check for potential asset write-down risks.
-30.67
Negative FCF while Solar median P/FCF is -2.89. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
47.78
P/OCF of 47.78 versus zero operating cash flow in Solar. Walter Schloss would verify operational quality.
3.89
Fair value ratio exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.97. Jim Chanos would check for valuation bubble risks.
-25.03%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is 0.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-3.26%
Negative FCF while Solar median yield is -1.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.