PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.66
Negative P/E while Solar median is -0.45. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
5.07
P/S 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 4.58. John Neff would demand superior growth or margins to justify premium.
-11.09
Negative equity while Solar median P/B is 1.29. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-27.57
Negative FCF while Solar median P/FCF is -6.67. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-87.95
Negative operating cash flow while Solar median P/OCF is -1.14. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-11.09
Negative fair value while Solar median is 1.29. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-6.83%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is -1.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-3.63%
Negative FCF while Solar median yield is -3.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.