PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.71
Negative P/E while Solar median is -0.37. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
2.33
P/S less than half the Solar median of 6.31. Walter Schloss would verify if this discount reflects fixable issues. Check margins versus peers.
2.37
P/B 1.1-1.25x Solar median of 1.97. John Neff would demand superior ROE to justify premium.
32.40
Positive FCF while Solar median shows negative FCF. Peter Lynch would examine cash flow generation advantage.
21.56
P/OCF of 21.56 versus zero operating cash flow in Solar. Walter Schloss would verify operational quality.
2.37
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 1.72. Guy Spier would scrutinize if premium reflects durable advantages.
-3.73%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is -0.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
3.09%
Positive FCF while Solar median shows negative FCF. Peter Lynch would examine cash generation advantage.