PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.66
Negative P/E while Solar median is -0.62. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
2.20
P/S less than half the Solar median of 5.34. Walter Schloss would verify if this discount reflects fixable issues. Check margins versus peers.
-1.39
Negative equity while Solar median P/B is 2.04. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-33.63
Negative FCF while Solar median P/FCF is -3.98. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-33.63
Negative operating cash flow while Solar median P/OCF is 4.77. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-1.39
Negative fair value while Solar median is 2.04. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-15.08%
Negative earnings while Solar median yield is -21.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-2.97%
Negative FCF while Solar median yield is -4.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.