PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.59
Negative P/E while Energy median is -1.62. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
5.85
P/S 1.1-1.25x Energy median of 5.08. John Neff would demand superior growth or margins to justify premium.
1.66
P/B exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.94. Jim Chanos would check for potential asset write-down risks.
-5.11
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is -7.74. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-6.08
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 13.14. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
1.66
Fair value ratio exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.94. Jim Chanos would check for valuation bubble risks.
-3.80%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-19.56%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is -0.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.