PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-2.59
Negative P/E while Energy median is 5.38. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
6.92
P/S 1.1-1.25x Energy median of 5.60. John Neff would demand superior growth or margins to justify premium.
2.75
P/B exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.15. Jim Chanos would check for potential asset write-down risks.
-12.83
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is -1.54. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-17.95
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 16.14. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
2.75
Fair value ratio exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.15. Jim Chanos would check for valuation bubble risks.
-9.65%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 0.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-7.80%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is -0.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.