PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-6.41
Negative P/E while Energy median is 8.80. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
5.37
P/S near Energy median of 5.48. Charlie Munger would examine if similar pricing reflects similar economics.
-41.13
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.35. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-11.99
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 0.00. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-14.23
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 18.04. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-41.13
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.35. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-3.90%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 0.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-8.34%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.