PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
2.70
P/E 1.1-1.25x Energy median of 2.28. Philip Fisher would demand superior growth metrics to justify premium.
44.27
P/S exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.38. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
-15.74
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.06. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-23.00
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 0.00. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-30.77
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 9.57. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-15.74
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.06. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
9.24%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.52%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if high yield reflects hidden value.
-4.35%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.