PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.19
Positive P/E while Energy median is negative at -0.91. Peter Lynch would investigate competitive advantages in a distressed Energy.
11.45
P/S exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.06. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
-305.46
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 0.68. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-64.48
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 4.51. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-72.04
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 8.06. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-305.46
Negative fair value while Energy median is 0.67. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
3.48%
Positive earnings while Energy median shows losses. Peter Lynch would examine earnings quality advantage.
-1.55%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 1.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.