PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-0.66
Negative P/E while Energy median is 8.32. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
2.53
P/S 50-90% of Energy median of 4.90. Mohnish Pabrai would investigate if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
-0.30
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.36. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-4.63
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 0.00. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-5.13
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 16.08. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-0.30
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.35. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-37.79%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-21.61%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.