PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-0.68
Negative P/E while Energy median is 7.84. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
38.25
P/S exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.24. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
-1.48
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.27. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
-9.79
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is 13.36. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-9.86
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 12.86. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
-1.48
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.26. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-36.82%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 1.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-10.22%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.