PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
153.85%
Net income growth above 1.5x SMR.AX's 41.57%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
15.17%
Less D&A growth vs. SMR.AX's 266.59%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while SMR.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
100.00%
Working capital change of 100.00% while SMR.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while SMR.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while SMR.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while SMR.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-258.19%
Both negative yoy, with SMR.AX at -97.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
169.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SMR.AX's 20.89%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
50.56%
Some CapEx rise while SMR.AX is negative at -53.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SMR.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.47%
We reduce yoy other investing while SMR.AX is 98.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-30.36%
We reduce yoy invests while SMR.AX stands at 64.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
241.90%
We repay more while SMR.AX is negative at -133.52%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.