0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
153.85%
Some net income increase while WHC.AX is negative at -20.93%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.17%
Some D&A expansion while WHC.AX is negative at -70.09%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SBC growth while WHC.AX is negative at -49.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Well above WHC.AX's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth well above WHC.AX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while WHC.AX is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while WHC.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-258.19%
Negative yoy while WHC.AX is 236.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
169.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 20.54%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
50.56%
CapEx growth well above WHC.AX's 25.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while WHC.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with WHC.AX at -170.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-30.36%
We reduce yoy invests while WHC.AX stands at 94.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
241.90%
Debt repayment above 1.5x WHC.AX's 102.56%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.