PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
153.85%
Net income growth above 1.5x YAL.AX's 89.52%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
15.17%
D&A growth well above YAL.AX's 0.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while YAL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
100.00%
Working capital change of 100.00% while YAL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while YAL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while YAL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while YAL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-258.19%
Negative yoy while YAL.AX is 145.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
169.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x YAL.AX's 50.53%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
50.56%
Some CapEx rise while YAL.AX is negative at -45.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while YAL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with YAL.AX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-30.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with YAL.AX at -45.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
241.90%
Debt repayment above 1.5x YAL.AX's 100.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.