PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.84%
Net income growth of 13.84% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
71.91%
D&A growth of 71.91% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-147.63%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-46.46%
Negative CFO growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-113.23%
CapEx declines yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-194.24%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-551.86%
Reduced investing yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Coal median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.