PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
4.46M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.65 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73317.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NHC.AX's 493.93%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
73317.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NHC.AX's 138.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while NHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while NHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-171.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
181.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
181.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-103.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while NHC.AX stands at 231.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-103.58%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-104.87%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.