PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449386.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NHC.AX's 188.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
288.78%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
128.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 128.62% while NHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
18.69%
Below 50% of NHC.AX's 463.57%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6365.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
58.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-130.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-100.71%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-109.41%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-123.73%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.