PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1304718.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NHC.AX's 188.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
307.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NHC.AX's 92.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
68.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
48.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 48.56% while NHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-183.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NHC.AX is at 102.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-545.17%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
35.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-70.46%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.98%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-3408.92%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.