PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
774171.01%
10Y CAGR of 774171.01% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 111.55% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
109.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 109.20% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
116.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 116.84% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
62.27%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 62.27% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
48.91%
Below 50% of SMR.AX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
85.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 85.45% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-99.68%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SMR.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.