PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1473671.03%
10Y CAGR of 1473671.03% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
203.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 203.40% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
493.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 493.20% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
328.76%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 328.76% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
90.50%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 90.50% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-115.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SMR.AX is 1929.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
92.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 92.17% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-97.59%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SMR.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-96.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SMR.AX is at 197.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-67.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SMR.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.