0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2848309.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SMR.AX's 504205.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
664.00%
5Y CAGR of 664.00% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
54.86%
3Y CAGR of 54.86% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
509.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 509.72% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
92445.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 92445.56% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
379.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 379.37% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
252.17%
Below 50% of SMR.AX's 27420.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
14.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 14.85% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
709.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 709.76% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-93.13%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SMR.AX stands at 1206.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
130.19%
Equity/share CAGR of 130.19% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
36.04%
Equity/share CAGR of 36.04% while SMR.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.