PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.58%
Negative revenue growth while WHC.AX stands at 53.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
46.64%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x WHC.AX's 34.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
191.76%
EBIT growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 5.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
90.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 43.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
153.85%
Positive net income growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
154.17%
Positive EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
154.17%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.57%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.57%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 20.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
133.22%
FCF growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 53.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 388.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-72.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 203.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
117.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 2295.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
144.23%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 1023.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-87.51%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 100.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
101.21%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 220.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
119.90%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 253.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-94.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-55.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 104.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
62.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 101.72%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
525.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 117.69%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.37%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while WHC.AX is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
82.91%
We show growth while WHC.AX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-5.14%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.47%
We’re deleveraging while WHC.AX stands at 9.36%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.63%
SG&A declining or stable vs. WHC.AX's 38.93%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.