PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while WHC.AX stands at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-100.00%
Negative gross profit growth while WHC.AX is at 181.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
10.60%
Positive EBIT growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.60%
Positive operating income growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.84%
Positive net income growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.33%
Positive EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
16.66%
Share count expansion well above WHC.AX's 13.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
16.66%
Diluted share count expanding well above WHC.AX's 11.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.46%
Negative OCF growth while WHC.AX is at 54.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-93.76%
Negative FCF growth while WHC.AX is at 8.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 412.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 113.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 33.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-25.54%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-25.54%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-25.54%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 27.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
26.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
26.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
26.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.28%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.64%
We cut SG&A while WHC.AX invests at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.