PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.03%
EBIT growth of 43.03% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
43.03%
Operating income growth of 43.03% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
98.33%
Net income growth of 98.33% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
98.37%
EPS growth of 98.37% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
98.37%
Diluted EPS growth of 98.37% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
4.91%
Share change of 4.91% while WHC.AX is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
4.91%
Diluted share change of 4.91% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.77%
OCF growth of 59.77% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
58.01%
FCF growth of 58.01% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 412.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 113.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 33.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
51.86%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
51.86%
Positive OCF/share growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
51.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 27.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
98.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 0.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.75%
We cut SG&A while WHC.AX invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.