PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-80.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
5682.20%
Positive net income growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
5320.00%
Positive EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5326.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.50%
Share count expansion well above WHC.AX's 1.19%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above WHC.AX's 1.19%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.92%
OCF growth under 50% of WHC.AX's 1107.78%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-41.89%
Negative FCF growth while WHC.AX is at 13.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
73.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 5619.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
73.70%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 2268.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
73.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 818.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
162.86%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 162.86% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
162.86%
Net income/share CAGR of 162.86% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
162.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 162.86% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-26.50%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 1033.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 484.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 179.72%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.30%
We have a declining book value while WHC.AX shows 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
328.76%
SG&A growth well above WHC.AX's 200.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.