0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1839247.40%
10Y CAGR of 1839247.40% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2405.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 103.71%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
185.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 1214.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
144.47%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 790.74%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
219.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of WHC.AX's 282.92%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
75.04%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 75.04% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
95.60%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 925.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-130.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX is 1642.40%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-94.95%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 318.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-78.61%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 9.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
240.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 21.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.