PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1662649.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 631.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 894.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
60.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 113.19%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
41.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
84.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
93.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 133.98%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
82.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WHC.AX is at 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
180.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 4.51%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.