PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2454289.24%
10Y CAGR of 2454289.24% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
3243.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 39.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
66.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
160.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 289.46%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
184.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-41.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
74.81%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 74.81% while WHC.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-130.87%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-165.21%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-103.80%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 118.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-6.15%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-258.04%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.