PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 51.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-30.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 182.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
94.58%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-105.84%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
88.82%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
121.88%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 2686.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
377.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 2.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
149.43%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 438.79%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-87.09%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 89.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
105.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WHC.AX's 80.29%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
539.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 105.12%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.