PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 127.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-69.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 230.69%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
91.08%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of WHC.AX's 1507.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-120.06%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX is at 80.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-128.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WHC.AX stands at 841.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
98.98%
Below 50% of WHC.AX's 547.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
76.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WHC.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
77.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of WHC.AX's 127.45%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-68.22%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WHC.AX stands at 103.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
48.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of WHC.AX's 85.25%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
297.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WHC.AX's 146.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.