PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320318.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 7266.45%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
320318.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 7266.45%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 81.85% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
81.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 81.85% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
85.54%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-439.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-439.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-630.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while YAL.AX is 76.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-120.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 53.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.