PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73317.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 10261.49%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
73317.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 10261.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-171.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while YAL.AX stands at 269.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
181.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
181.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of YAL.AX's 54.62%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-103.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while YAL.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-103.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-104.87%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 11.57%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.