PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
25.8K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.57 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449386.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 440.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
288.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x YAL.AX's 2.51%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
128.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 128.62% while YAL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
18.69%
Positive OCF/share growth while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6365.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
58.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while YAL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of YAL.AX's 75.12%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
-130.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-100.71%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while YAL.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-109.41%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-123.73%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while YAL.AX is at 19.46%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.