0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-100.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
10.60%
EBIT growth of 10.60% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
10.60%
Operating income growth of 10.60% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
13.84%
Net income growth of 13.84% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
23.33%
EPS growth of 23.33% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
23.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.33% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
16.66%
Share change of 16.66% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
16.66%
Diluted share change of 16.66% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.46%
Negative OCF growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-93.76%
Negative FCF growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-25.54%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-25.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-25.54%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
26.15%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Coal is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
26.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Coal median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
26.15%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Coal median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.28%
Negative BV/share change while Coal median is -0.04%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.64%
SG&A decline while Coal grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.