0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73317.96%
10Y CAGR of 73317.96% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
73317.96%
5Y CAGR of 73317.96% while Coal is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
28.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.58% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-171.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
181.61%
Net income/share CAGR of 181.61% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
181.61%
Net income/share CAGR of 181.61% while Coal median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
29.82%
Below 50% of Coal median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
-103.58%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Coal median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-103.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Coal median is -19.51%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-104.87%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Coal median is -13.48%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.