PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.58%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -1.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
46.64%
Gross profit growth of 46.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
191.76%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
90.24%
Operating income growth of 90.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
153.85%
Net income growth of 153.85% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
154.17%
EPS growth of 154.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
154.17%
Diluted EPS growth of 154.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.57%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.35%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.57%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.21%
OCF growth of 169.21% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
133.22%
FCF growth of 133.22% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-72.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
117.39%
OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 83.24%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if disciplined capex and stable margins contribute to this advantage.
144.23%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 59.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-87.51%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 59.56%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
101.21%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
119.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 67.49%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-94.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 44.16%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-55.05%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -30.50%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
62.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 62.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
525.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 6.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.37%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.37% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
82.91%
Inventory growth of 82.91% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-5.14%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.07%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.47%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.63%
SG&A growth far above Energy median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.