PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.03%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
43.03%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
98.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
98.37%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
98.37%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
4.91%
Share change of 4.91% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
4.91%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.77%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
58.01%
FCF growth of 58.01% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 11.70%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 13.34%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
51.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 51.86% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
51.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 51.86% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
51.86%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
98.82%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 19.98% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
98.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 98.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
98.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.76%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.39%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.19%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.75%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.